Search for: "JIM FLEMINGS" Results 1 - 20 of 98
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2013, 7:50 pm by JB
For convenience, here are all of the posts for our February Symposium on Jim Fleming and Linda McClain's new book, Ordered Liberty: Rights, Responsibilities, and Virtues (Harvard University Press, 2013).Jack Balkin, IntroductionSotirios Barber, On Fleming and McClain’s Ordered Liberty James E. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 3:00 am by JB
This week we'll be hosting an online symposium on Jim Fleming and Linda McClain's new book, Ordered Liberty: Rights, Responsibilities, and Virtues (Harvard University Press, 2013). [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 6:30 am by ernst
At the time of her passing Anne was engaged in a new book project: Household Borrowing and Bankruptcy in Jim Crow America, 1920-1960. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 12:48 pm by Rick Garnett
Over at Concurring Opinions, there is a very interesting "symposium" going on about Linda McClain and Jim Fleming's important new book, Ordered Liberty. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 6:18 am
Scroll to the end of the post for two updates--comments from Sot Barber & Jim Fleming. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 6:00 am by JB
This week at Balkinization we are hosting a symposium on Jim Fleming's new book, Constructing Basic Liberties: A Defense of Substantive Due Process (University of Chicago Press, 2022).We have assembled a terrific group of commentators, including Aziza Ahmed (B.U.), Carlos Ball (Rutgers), Mark Graber (Maryland), Cathleen Kaveny (B.C.), Guha Krishnamurthi (Oklahoma), Sandy Levinson (Texas), Serena Mayeri (Penn), Doug NeJaime (Yale), Reva Siegel (Yale), and Ilan Wurman… [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 9:30 am by JB
Here are the collected posts for our Balkinization symposium on Jim Fleming's new book, Constructing Basic Liberties: A Defense of Substantive Due Process (University of Chicago Press, 2022).1. [read post]
3 Sep 2007, 9:09 am
Larry Solum has live-blogged the APSA panel on the "New Originalism," featuring Sandy Levinson, Jack Balkin, Keith Whittington, Sot Barber, Jim Fleming, and our own Randy Barnett. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 5:30 am by JB
On SSRN, I've posted a draft of History, Rights and the Moral Reading, a review of Jim Fleming's new book, Fidelity to Our Imperfect Constitution. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 12:05 am by Paul Caron
Jim Jordan (OH-4), Tim Huelskamp (KS-1) & John Fleming (LA-4): Today Americans see two sets of rules: one for the powerful and politically connected and another for ordinary Americans. [read post]
3 Sep 2007, 1:31 am
Sandy Levinson and I were on a panel on the New Originalism, along with Sot Barber, Keith Whittington, Randy Barnett and Jim Fleming. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 8:44 pm by ernst
 Anne was also fully embarked on an enormously exciting book project, “Household Borrowing and Bankruptcy in Jim Crow America, 1920-1960. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 6:33 am by Ted Frank
"'He said he had worked too long and too hard for a lousy $41 million,' said Jim Doyle, who left the firm after objecting to Fleming's unusual decision to include non-client expenses among those billed to clients. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:17 am by Stephen Griffin
Last October Jim Fleming of BU was kind enough to host me and Mariah Zeisberg for a conference on our recent books on presidential war powers. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
 This is the great contribution of Jim Fleming’s book. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 8:58 am by Mark Graber
            Jim Fleming and/or Linda McClain should be on the Supreme Court. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
It is the latter because the Supreme Court, weeks before the publication of Jim Fleming’s Constructing Basic Liberties, made mincemeat of fundamental rights doctrine (and of stare decisis) in Dobbs v. [read post]
3 Sep 2007, 2:57 am
The first post is on the panel on The New Originalism and it had an "all star" lineup--Jack Balkin, Sot Barber, Randy Barnett, Jim Fleming, Sandy Levinson, and Keith Whittington. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 5:06 am by Steve Shiffrin
Jim Fleming argued that it is mythical to suppose that strict scrutiny applies in due process cases and the book maintains that the cases have meandered on this issue. [read post]